Re: Docs for service file

Tom Lane wrote:
> Rather than documenting it and thereby locking ourselves into a
> misdesigned "feature", I'd vote for removing code and docs too.
> We can put the concept on the TODO-for-protocol-change list instead.

Other votes?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073