Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)
Дата
Msg-id 20030101133815.Y81242-200000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > I see the values being stored on constriant creation, but not being used
> > > anywhere:
> >
> > I believe the values that actually get inspected at runtime are the
> > tgdeferrable and tginitdeferred fields in pg_trigger.  The columns in
> > pg_constraint are just copies of these.
> >
> > It is not real clear to me whether it should be allowed to alter the
> > deferrability status of a foreign-key constraint --- is that in the spec?
>
> The big problem is that while pg_dump's dump_trigger() looks at
> tginitdeferred and dumps accordingly, pg_get_constraintdef doesn't look
> at tginitdeferred, and therefore doesn't record the requirement as part
> of ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT.

pg_get_constraintdef should probably be looking at condeferrable
and condeferred in the pg_constraint row it's looking at.  Maybe something
like the attached.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)
Следующее
От: mlw
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker