Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2003.1301784617@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote:
>> This might be nitpicking (or i'm currently missing something), but i
>> recognized that setting wal_buffers = -1 always triggers the following on
>> reload, even if nothing to wal_buffers had changed:
>>
>> $ pg_ctl reload
>> LOG: �received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
>> LOG: �parameter "wal_buffers" cannot be changed without restarting the
>> server
>>
>> This only happens when you have wal_buffers set to -1.
> This is a bug. The root cause is that, on startup, we do this:
> if (xbuffers != XLOGbuffers)
> {
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", xbuffers);
> SetConfigOption("wal_buffers", buf, PGC_POSTMASTER,
> PGC_S_OVERRIDE);
> }
> I had intended to commit Greg's patch with a show hook and an assign
> hook and the calculated value stored separately from the GUC variable,
> which I believe would avoid this is a problem, but Tom thought this
> way was better. Unfortunately, my knowledge of the GUC machinery is
> insufficient to think of a way to avoid it, other than the one Tom
> already rejected.
Mph ... I think this shows the error of my thinking :-(. We at least
need an assign hook here. Will fix, since it was my oversight to begin
with.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: