Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Good catch. Hmm this may be a serious problem because
> > there's no way to know the row count when we use EXECUTE
> > statements.
>
> I wonder if EXECUTE could/should be made to return the appropriate
> command status string for the executed statement, instead of "EXECUTE".
I think it should return "EXECUTE" with the counts from the commands.
Does that make sense?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073