* Daniel Serodio (daniel@checkforte.com.br) wrote:
> Old Javadoc indeed. I'm using 1.3.1. I can't recall right now, is the
> JDBC in Java 1.3.1 is JDBC2? Maybe the app (reversedb) should try to
> find out if it's talking to JDBC2 or JDBC3, then use table=null or not
> accordingly. Is this viable?
At what we have found out here, it should not use table=null in either
case. Right?
But this "extension" (table=null) must work with some database drivers
since it is in OJB. Maybe it is an "extension" that postgresql driver
should also have?
If this "extension" is not available then reversedb must iterate through
every table and do very many getPrimeryKeys, this will probably need a
lot more computer power?
Anders
--
Anders Hermansen
YoYo Mobile as