Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Дата
Msg-id 200212102336.gBANa4Z25518@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
OK, seeing that we don't have a third number, do people want me to
increment the interface numbers for 7.3.1, or just wait for the
increment in 7.4?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
> 
> > It is not real clear to me whether we need a major version bump, rather
> > than a minor one.  We *do* need to signal binary incompatibility.  Who
> > can clarify the rules here?
> 
> Strictly speaking, it's platform-dependent, but our shared library code
> plays a bit of abuse with it.  What it comes down to is:
> 
> If you change or remove an interface, increment the major version number.
> If you add an interface, increment the minor version number.  If you did
> neither but changed the source code at all, increment the third version
> number, if we had one.
> 
> To be thoroughly amused, read the libtool source.  Grep for 'version_type'.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
> 
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: protocol change in 7.4
Следующее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?