On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:55:51PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 01:22 PM 9/12/2002 -0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >Hmmm...I'm not certain that the \d commands really NEED to have a logical
> >link to the actual thing you're listing.
>
> This is the perspective a person with good memory, unlike me. In find it
> useful to be able to derive commands from common-sense rules, even if it
> means a little more typing.
Would it work to make \d tab-completable in a way that showed both the
commands that are available and the objects they describe? e.g.
\d<tab> would show something like
\dt [tables] \ds [sequences] \dv [views] ...
(the way it's shown now shows what completions are available, but not
what they mean. Also, both \d and \D should be shown in any case)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Los romanticos son seres que mueren de deseos de vida"