Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> We could do DESCRIBE commands as well. Also, what happened to the
> INFORMATION_SCHEMA proposal? Wasn't Peter E doing something with that?
> What happened to it?
>
> > The issue here is what do we do with the existing "\d[istvS]" behavior
> > (for instance, "\dsit" means "list sequences, indexes, and tables").
> > Is that useful enough to try to preserve, or do we just bit-bucket it?
> > If we do try to preserve it, how should it work?
>
> I'd much rather it were preserved, and I'm sure most people would as well.
I was going to say the opposite, that it isn't needed. Oh well.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073