Tom Lane wrote:
> If the parser treated PUBLIC as an actual keyword, you'd not be having
> this problem, because keywords are case-folded on an ASCII-only basis
> (which is consistent with the SQL99 spec, amazingly enough).
>
> We put in the above hack after someone complained that PUBLIC didn't use
> to be a reserved word ... but considering that SQL92 clearly lists it as
> a reserved word, there's not a lot of ground for that complaint to stand
> on.
>
> I'd prefer shifting PUBLIC back to the true-keyword category over any
> of the other workarounds you've suggested ...
PUBLIC doesn't seem like a very common column name --- seems safe to
make it reserved. We made 'value' reserved in 7.3, and that was a much
more common one.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073