This started out to be a discussion about working with
PostgreSQL using MS Access: to which ODBC driver
functionality is highly relevant, but not the whole
picture.
Some kind of work that brings together into one place
all of the bits that may presently be found scattered
around various sites and throughout the list archives
would appear to be A Good Thing. There is no need for
anything about the ODBC documentation to change. The
only question out there is, how best to do this, and
of course, who ;-)
--- Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Clift [mailto:justin@postgresql.org]
> > Sent: 28 November 2002 20:05
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Jeff Eckermann; Bruce Momjian;
> pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [ODBC] Can't get more than 255 chars
> out of memo
> > field in Acc
> >
> > Um, just trying to encourage people to create
> stuff which
> > makes things easier for people.
> >
> > Don't *really* care where it ends up.
> >
> > Like, if someone wants to create a
> guide/doc/stuff/anything,
> > then I reckon "Cool".
>
> I quite agree. I have 2 issues though *in this
> case*.
>
> 1) Adding additional ODBC FAQs in a different place
> from the rest will
> just confuse things. I'm in the process of moving
> all the docs/faqs to
> the Gborg project at the moment. I also don't care
> where it goes in the
> end, but I think it should *all* go to either Gborg
> or Techdocs. Let's
> finish the portal first though...
>
> 2) I don't think we should document (as a FAQ or
> otherwise) an
> individual issue that has been noted only twice
> afaik with a barely beta
> driver (a driver which doesn't seem to show this
> problem on any of my
> machines BTW).
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com