Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al
Дата
Msg-id 200210212311.g9LNBqo21724@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > One particularly nasty problem is issuing a VACUUM or TRUNCATE in cases
> > where you don't know the autocommit mode.  You could set autocommit to
> > 'on', and issue the command, but how do you know if you need to turn
> > autocommit back off again?
> 
> Perhaps RESET AUTOCOMMIT is a good enough answer?

I was unclear on that.  RESET sets it back to the postgresql.conf value,
right?  Do we know that the session didn't change it earlier in the
script?  That's where it gets tricky.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: One 7.3 item left