Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See the open
> > items list. I think we will need until the middle of next week for
> > beta2. In fact, I have the inheritance patch that will require an
> > initdb and that isn't even applied yet; Friday is too early.
>
> We are in beta, not release ... the purpose of going to beta2 is to
> provide a new checkpoint to work bug reports off of, so having to deal
> with an initdb should not be considered a problem by anyone, since only a
> fool would run beta in production, no? (and ya, I am such a fool at times,
> but i do accept the fact that I am such *grin*)
We should get _all_ the known initdb-related issues into the code before
we go beta2 or beta3 is going to require another initdb.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073