On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> En Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:22:52 -0300 (ADT)
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> escribi�:
>
> > but, if you look at the 'actual messages' in the results, they go
> > something like:
> >
> > 1.JDBC test suite patch [1359020032]
> > I tried sending the email to jdbc and patches on the 17th but it didn't get through. I'm attempting again.. The
attachedpatch is my first run-through of the JDBC test suite. A summary of changes: . removal of the tablename property
frombuild.xml . additi...
>
> Very nice.
>
> One little thing is that some HTML codes seem to be escaped twice, so
> one sees things such as
>
> 1.Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance [16842752]
>
> On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 16:14, Tom Lane wrote: > Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes: > > I've come upon
amisbehaviour of drop column, where drop column > > unconditionally drops inherited column from child tables.
>> What it shou...
not sure why its doing that yet ... next thing to look into :)
> And what is the big number at the end of the subject? Looks like some
> kind of score, but I don't think it's meaningful to the user as is (can
> it be shown as a sort of percentage?)
Haven't got a clue, actually ... I noticed it also, but haven't had a
chance yet to look further at it then as a curiosity ... will see what I
can come up with ...