Re: more buffer paranoia

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: more buffer paranoia
Дата
Msg-id 200208282046.g7SKk6P27229@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на more buffer paranoia  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Neil Conway wrote:
> This patch adds length checking for a bunch of instances in the
> backend where a statically sized buffer is written to. Most of these
> should be pretty safe in practice, but it's probably better to be safe
> than sorry.
>
> I was actually looking for cases where NAMEDATALEN is assumed to be
> 32, but only found one. That's fixed too, as well as a few bits of
> code cleanup.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix for segfault in pgmodule.c: pgquery_dictresult()
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CREATE INDEX error message