Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete
Дата
Msg-id 200208202043.g7KKhR903255@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think we should throw the notices right away, although this makes me
> > wonder in general about upgrade path.  Are we ever planning to make that
> > an error, and if so, how are we going to handle functions that are coming
> > from previous versions where it was okay?
> 
> We can't make it an error until sufficiently far down the road that we
> don't care about forward compatibility from 7.2-or-before dump files.
> That'll be a long while, probably.
> 
> Throwing a notice right away is okay with me personally, but I wanted to
> see what other people thought...

NOTICE seems good.  We will have all this mentioned in the release notes
too.  In fact, we can point to the release notes in the NOTICE if
desired.

I like the array storage format change too.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL (fwd)
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL (fwd)