Re: BUG: PGACCESS does not warn when trying to update a record that was deleted by someone else.
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:
| От | terry |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG: PGACCESS does not warn when trying to update a record that was deleted by someone else. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020814233925.E75494763E2@postgresql.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | BUG: PGACCESS does not warn when trying to update a record that was deleted by someone else. (Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan@nsd.ca>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Actually, M$ Access does the same thing. When a form (or query) is populated with the contents of a record, it no longer is changed within the database - only within the form (or query). It is only when the record is saved that there is any indication of change or deletion. The only way to determine if the record in the form (or query) has been changed or deleted is to check that record in the database during the operation, which is not routinely done. >> DARN!!! >> >> I have just wasted half a day updating record with PcAccess. >> >> If one is updating a record that was deleted by someone else, >> PgAccess does not warn that the record no longer exists and >> silently accept the update. >> >> Then, if the list is refreshed, the record is gone!!! >> >> ---------------------------(end of >> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked >> our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html -- terry
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера