Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Larry Rosenman dijo:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 15:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes:
> > > > I attach a patch that adds the PGPASSWORDFILE ability to libpq, and
> > > > removes the use of PGPASSWORD.
> > >
> > > Were we actually going to *remove* that, as opposed to deprecate it?
> > >
> > > There are systems (in fact many) where it's perfectly secure, so I'm
> > > not that thrilled about removing functionality ...
>
> > PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE IT WITHOUT AT LEAST ONE RELEASE CYCLE WARNING.
> >
> > You will ****BREAK**** People.
>
> Ok, advice taken. New patch attached. Preserves the ability to use
> PGPASSWORD, which in fact has preference over PGPASSWORDFILE.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
> www.google.com: interfaz de linea de comando para la web.
Content-Description:
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073