Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, time to get moving folks. Looks like the increase in the function
> > args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested.
>
> I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt
> too much. But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN? In
> particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?
No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%? No, we did a test for 64.
Can someone get us that number for 128?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026