Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > In fact, looking at it logically...if all the commands currently are
> > > required to check that they're not modifiying a system column,
> > then why not
> > > add the requirement that they must also not modify dropped
> > columns? I can
> > > do a careful doc search and try to make sure I've touched everything...
> >
> > Makes sense. Of course, we could make a syscache that didn't return
> > system columns either.
>
> Actually - are you certain that every command uses a SearchSysCache and not
> some other weirdness? If we have to do the odd exception, then maybe we
> should do them all as 'exceptions'?
I actually don't know. I know all the table name lookups do use
syscache or temp tables wouldn't have worked. ;-)
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026