Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > So, is you vote for or against the elog(NOTICE)?
>
> OK, if we are still voting, then I'll mention that I generally dislike
> the idea of notices of this kind. And would not like this notice in
> particular. So would vote no with both hands ;)
>
> I'm pretty sure that we have a consensus policy (hmm, at least if a
> consensus consists of repeated votes on one question or the other) that
> notices to protect people from doing what they ask the system to do are
> not generally desirable.
>
> Putting messages in as a spur to development is not particularly
> effective; witness a few chapters in the docs which consist of "This
> needs to be written. Any volunteers?" and which have stayed untouched
> for three years now ;)
OK, elog(NOTICE) is voted down. SGML docs are updated. We don't need
an FAQ item for this, do we?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026