Re: intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От pgsql-gen Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com)
Тема Re: intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2
Дата
Msg-id 200204290410.g3T4A1B10828@basebeans.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2  (postgres@vrane.com)
Список pgsql-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] intel vs amd benchmark for pg server part 2
From: Vic Cekvenich <vic@basebeans.com>
 ===

Or a disk caching controler (like Mylex or Penging Computing)
Any DB is IO bound.

Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
> Curt Sampson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 postgres@vrane.com wrote:
>>
>>> Another gripe I have is that vacuum process does not eat up 100%
>>> of cpu.  In the beginning it peaks around 80% and at the end
>>> it is stuck around 20%.
>>>
>>
>> That's because your disk subsystem is too slow for the machine.
>> Put in a disk subsystem that doesn't slow down the machine, and
>> you'll use all your CPU.
>>
>> Then you can complain about not using all your disk I/O capacity.
>>
>> Performance bottlenecks never go away. You can only move them around.
>>
> Thats why we all call it "chasing the brass ring" :)
>
>>
>> cjs
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: icps, shmmax and shmall - Shared Memory tuning
Следующее
От: Michael Loftis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OIDs