Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >     Sure  should  it!  You  gave  an example for the need to roll
> >     back, because
> >  otherwise you would  end  up  with  an  invalid
> >     search path "foo".
>
> What's wrong with it ? The insert command after *rollback*
> would fail. It seems the right thing to me. Otherwise
> the insert command would try to append the data of the
> table t1 to itself. The insert command is for copying
> schema1.t1 to foo.t1 in case the previous create schema
> command suceeded.
   Wrong about your entire example is that the rollback is sheer   wrong placed to make up your case ;-p
   There is absolutely no need to put the insert outside of  the   transaction that is intended to copy schema1.t1 to
foo.t1.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #