Re: Suggestion for optimization
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Suggestion for optimization |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020406184224.B99366-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Suggestion for optimization ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> AFAICS, making them exact would not improve the planning estimates > at all, because there are too many other sources of error. We have > approximate stats already via vacuum/analyze statistics gathering. > >> > What happens if someone deletes 75% of a table? > What happens if someone imports 30 times more rows than are already in > the table? > What happens if one table is remarkably small or even empty and you are > unaware? If you are unaware of any of the above, you'll get poorer performance. Just make sure you run ANALYZE often enough. Anyone who does a massive change in the number of rows in a table, or updates most of a table should always do an ANALYZE afterwards. Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: