Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > "CREATE TABLE test (x int NULL)" doesn't look great either. :-) What
> > is that NULL doing there?
>
> Well, because NOT NULL *was* in the standard, and because one should be
> able to explicitly negate *that*. The alternative was
>
> CREATE TABLE test (x int NOT NOT NULL)
>
> :O
Yea, what I meant is that NULL doesn't look too clear in CREATE TABLE
either.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026