Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Дата
Msg-id 200203112150.g2BLo9N28603@saturn.janwieck.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Greg Copeland wrote:
> > >
> > > Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
> > > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > > > I'm looking through the index code and just happened to notice that
> > > > INDEX_MAX_KEYS is currently set to 16.  It there a reason for this value
> > > > to be at 16 or was it arbitrarily specified?
> > >
> > > Arbitrary, and there is discussion about increasing it.
> >
> >     Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of
> >     function args?
>
> Yes, they are related.  At least I think so.  Anyway, the parameter that
> needs increasing is max function args.  I got mixed up there.
   Then  again,  if  they are related, why not let the index max   keys be automatically set according to the function
max arg   configuration?   Is  there any reason someone want's to limit   it smaller than the system could technically
handle?


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS