On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > What would be more efficient for storing a value that is 5 Bytes long?
> > decimal(5) or int8?
> > Does decimal(5) actually uses up only 5 bytes? Does that cause any
> > problems?
>
> int8 wins on all counts afaik. decimal() and numeric() store things as
> quasi-BCD and is less dense than a true binary storage type.
I decided to find a way to store the number, a key, in 4 bytes. Not what I
wanted, but... given the "issues" I read about int8 such as having
problems been recognized by the optimizer when doing searches.
The example on the docs is that something like:
select * from table where <int8> = ###
would not use the index. One would have to do:
select * from table where <int8> = '###'
Which is a pain.