Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question
Дата
Msg-id 200203080112.g281CSX25805@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pl/pgsql Composite Parameter Question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> <cnliou@eurosport.com> writes:
> > Because pl/pgsql accepts at most 16 parameters, I am
> > trying to feed pl/pgsql function with the whole
> > record as its parameter.
>
> Looks like a bug to me :-(.  Unfortunately, there's no time to do
> anything about it for 7.2.  In the meantime, the 16-parameter limit
> is by no means graven in stone; perhaps you could cope for awhile
> by recompiling with a larger FUNC_MAX_ARGS.

Tom, can you summarize the issue here?.  Our 16-param limit is for both
old and new-style functions?  Did we agree to increase this, perhaps to
24 or 32.  Did we decide?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL for PS/2 ?
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: April 1