Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users
Дата
Msg-id 200203060317.g263Hr722602@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > It has not been fixed.  One TODO item is to either stop mentioning hash
> > at all or get it improved.  We have been sitting on the fence for too
> > long.
> 
> Could someone give me a quick rundown on where using a hash index would be
> advantageous over using a btree index?

That is the issue, right now, there is little or no advantage.  If we
can improve it, it may become better than btree for cases where you are
only doing equal comparisons, rather than > which only btree can do.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users
Следующее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrentusers