Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Can you take care of the echo of entered password too,
>
> I'm unconvinced that that's wrong, and will not change it without
> more discussion. (1) The reason it was put in was to allow debugging
> of "that's the wrong password" mistakes. (2) The postmaster log
> inherently contains a great deal of sensitive information, so anyone
> who runs with it world-readable has a problem already. (3) The password
> is not emitted unless the message level is a lot lower than anyone would
> routinely use. (4) If you're using the recommended MD5 encryption
> approach, then what's logged is encrypted; it seems no more dangerous
> than having encrypted passwords in pg_shadow.
OK, I have thought about how we display invalid passwords in the server
logs. This isn't an issue if the password is the same as stored in
pg_shadow. However, if the invalid password was incorrect because it
was their Unix password or a password on another machine, I think we do
have an issue storing it in the server logs. I can't think of any unix
utility that stores invalid passwords in the log, no matter what the
debugging level, and I don't think we should be doing it either.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026