Re: atomicity
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: atomicity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200202271650.g1RGoVLx019262@www1.translationforge обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: atomicity (Gurudutt <guru@indvalley.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> ZG> MySQL has a large, well-tested feature set that includes fewer > ZG> traditional RDBMS features that PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL and MySQL come > ZG> from very different traditions. PostgreSQL is the heir to quite > ZG> phenonmenal amounts of academic research work that focused on > ZG> developing a complete set of RDBMS features. MySQL evolved from a set > ZG> of working development tools - it was developed with attention to > ZG> speed, stability and performance at the cost of certain features. MySQL surely employs a team of communication specialists. This kind of argument can only be invented by a non-technician, non-programmer, non-RDBMS, "marketing" someone. All this reminds me of my MBA. > MySQL AG employs a REAL team of FAKE communication specialists > whose goal is to sell a FAKE product to a team of FAKE investors, > who in turn will resell this FAKE company to a team of REAL people > who in turn will loose their REAL money. And cry... /JMP
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: