Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> I'm interested in point-in-time-recovery (or archive recovery) too.
> I'm wondering current implementation of CHECKPOINT is whether "SHARP"
> or "FUZZY" checkopint. If it's a "SHARP" one, it would be a serious
> performance bottle neck according to the Gray's transaction book. Does
> anybody know anything about that?
We have a FUZZY checkpoint because we continue processing during
the checkpoint period. In fact, we can add WAL files during the
checkpoint activity.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026