Re: Feature requests after crash
От | Jean-Michel POURE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature requests after crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200202221150.g1MBo3FP010844@www1.translationforge обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature requests after crash (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Le Jeudi 21 Février 2002 23:39, Dave Page a écrit : > Without these parsers, we will not be able to track dependencies within > functions or views. Why do we need parsers? pgAdmin I had very simple queries to track dependencies (ILIKE '%function_foo%' clause). This suffice to build a provides clause is each object. For example, if "function_foo" is used in "view_bar" and "function_bar": function_foo->provides="function:function_bar;view:view_bar" view_bar->requires="function:function_foo"; function_bar->requires="function:function_foo"; If you prefer, provides = child, requires = father. I agree this is not as powerfull as a recursive dependency table, but this suffice to offer 99% security to users. The purpose is not to track n-levels of dependecies but just visualize 1 level for security reasons. So why not implement it in pgSchema? Cheers, Jean-Michel
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: