Re: Index on timestamp field, and now()

Tom Lane wrote:
> Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes:
> > Oups. Sorry my mistake. But 7.2's limited understanding is enough to do
> > constant propagation as far as I can see. :-)))
>
> Correct, it's the now() function that's not cachable --- but you can get
> around that with the "timestamp 'now'" kluge.

Isn't CURRENT_TIMESTAMP the preferred method for this?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026