Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Дата
Msg-id 200202070228.SAA15249@mail.ucsd.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (Haroldo Stenger <hstenger@adinet.com.uy>)
Ответы Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (<mkscott@sacadia.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Let's make a pro cons list of thread related aspectcs here. We saw a lot of
> cons. Write some pros explicitely. We're not in a hurry anyway.

I think in addition to pros/cons, an important question is:
How has threading influenced other DBMS's? I know MySQL uses threading, at 
least in the development version; how much has it helped? Is the utility of a 
database based partly on the presence of threading? Take Oracle, MsSQL, and 
others; which have threading and which seem to gain from threading?

I don't follow the other DB's as closely, so I don't know the answers.

I suspect that looking at other databases will give us a clue about the 
magnitude of the pros, rather than just the areas of influence.

Regards,Jeff


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Следующее
От: Haroldo Stenger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server