Re: implemention of calls to stored procs.
| От | Holger Krug |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: implemention of calls to stored procs. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020123123053.A16727@dev12.rationalizer.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: implemention of calls to stored procs. (Nic Ferrier <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: implemention of calls to stored procs.
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:32:04AM +0000, Nic Ferrier wrote: > As for your 1st objective... I don't think that would be easy, even > with what I'm proposing there would have to be some sort of RMI or > CORBA link to the remote app. As far as I know, GCJ provides RMI libs, although not 100% tested. It should be relatively easy because you must not handle transactions. Concerning your implementation. Did I understand you right, that you've implemented your own Connection class, in an instance of which you encapsulate the current backend transaction ? If yes, so OK, it's probably simpler than getting RMI to work, and really nice. -- Holger Krug hkrug@rationalizer.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: