> > The only but very significant reason I can see about psqlodbc
> > CVS is that people can see (nearly) up to date source at the
> > official place. People can compile it by themselves and try it.
>
> A fair point. Other projects than this would likely already have
> a CVS branch going for the-next-version. Historically we've not
> done that, so as to avoid having to double-patch bug fixes into
> two separate branches. But this release cycle is going so darn
> slow that I'm half inclined to agree that making a 7.3 branch now
> would be better.
>
> [ Or, we could get off our collective rears and get 7.2 out the
> door. Hiroshi is not at fault, but some of us on this side of
> the Pacific are ... ]
The only problem with a 7.3 branch now is double-patching, but I am
willing to do it for my stuff and the stuff I apply. Our post-final .0
release has very few patches these days so branching is not as big a
deal, _and_ some of us are fulltime so can do the double-patching.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026