Re: checkpoint reliability

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: checkpoint reliability
Дата
Msg-id 200112190410.fBJ4AKr18862@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: checkpoint reliability  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I was wondering, when we start to reuse a WAL file, do we know that all
> > dirty buffers modified in that WAL file have been flushed to disk?
> 
> Yes.  At least two checkpoints ago, in fact.

So when we decide to reuse a shared memory buffer and write it to disk,
do we fsync it, or do we run a file sync() to force all dirty buffers to
disk?


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hiroshi Inoue
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problems with table corruption continued
Следующее
От: Hiroshi Inoue
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: checkpoint reliability