Re: date_part vs extract

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brent Verner
Тема Re: date_part vs extract
Дата
Msg-id 20011129094839.GB11369@rcfile.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на date_part vs extract  (Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>)
Список pgsql-sql
On 29 Nov 2001 at 09:45 (+0100), Markus Bertheau wrote:
| I wonder about the difference between date_part('week', ...) and
| extract(week from ...) not only but also from a performance point of
| view. I read extract is standard and date_part is not. Backwards
| compatibility maybe justifies the existence of date_part. Whats else?

The EXTRACT syntax ends up as a call to the internal date_part(...) 
function.  If SQL-portability is not a concern, calling date_part()
directly should be a bit quicker.

cheers. brent


-- 
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are 
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing."  -- Duane Allman


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Bertheau
Дата:
Сообщение: date_part vs extract
Следующее
От: Gary Stainburn
Дата:
Сообщение: Fixing faulty dates - select on day part of a date field