> In retrospect we should probably have told you to start with that there
> was no point in trying to get QNX6 support into 7.2. A localized patch
> (only adding port/qnx6/ directory and contents, no changes to shared
> files) perhaps would have been accepted two weeks ago, but by the time
> you had refined your submission down to that we were a lot closer to
> release than we were at the start of the discussion.
The minute the first patch appeared, I said it was too late and would be
in 7.3. and put it in the queue:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Igor didn't like that so I gave ideas to see if it could be trimmed down
and slipped in. I thought trimmed-down version might make it, but even
then, the odds were against it. I said I would pitch it to the group as
best I could.
At a certain point, even the work of verifying a patch is 100% safe is
too much work, and we are better off moving on.
Igor, it is not a personal thing about you or the patch. It is just the
mechanics of getting a release out. We can't make everyone happy, and
you are seeing that now.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026