I have added a mention of 'cvs status -v' to the developer's FAQ, with
your name on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> > Unfortunately "cvs log" isn't all that great about distinguishing
> > branches from tags --- it calls 'em all "symbolic names".
>
> Minor addition to this: you can distinguish branches and tags by using
> `cvs status -v'.
>
> (Historical note: CVS was originally implemented as shell scripts on
> top of RCS. The .0 syntax was magic which CVS used to indicate a
> branch as opposed to a revision tag. The output of `cvs log' is
> simply the output of `rlog' on the underlying RCS file. `cvs status'
> is not based on an existing RCS command.)
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 734: Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts --
> for support rather than illumination.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026