Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200110200251.f9K2pF427228@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit (Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
> If you are confident that LIMIT #,# would never be an official SQL
> standard who am I to second guess that ;) I don't see that possibility
> anywhere either, but I just wanted to make sure. The possibility that it
> might become an official standard is the only objection I had against
> deprecating and eventual elimination of that syntax.
>
> LIMIT # OFFSET # has my vote.
One more thing. I have added the code to suggest alternate syntax for
LIMIT #,#:
test=> select * from pg_class LIMIT 1,1;
ERROR: LIMIT #,# syntax no longer supported. Use LIMIT # OFFSET #.
If there are other queries that use syntax that frequently fails, I
would like to hear about it so we can generate a helpful error message
rather than just a generic syntax error.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: