--- wsheldah@lexmark.com wrote:
> What was wrong with JDBC::ODBC? I don't use Java, but I
> thought this solution
> was out there for a while already? Just not db-specific
> enough for them?
It's not that anything is wrong with it necessarily. But
JDBC::ODBC is a DB abstraction layer on top of a DB abstraction
layer, which loads on some overhead. I would think that MS is
trying to do away with those performance concerns and infiltrate
more Java shops through the back end (pun intended).
Brent
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com