Re: User locks code
| От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User locks code |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010824110656.C23091@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User locks code (Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Uh, guys? The last thing I can find that Massimo says about the license is this, from Sunday: On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:15:54PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: > > Regarding the licencing of the code, I always release my code under GPL, > which is the licence I prefer, but my code in the backend is obviously > released under the original postgres licence. Since the module is loaded > dynamically and not linked into the backend I don't see a problem here. > If the licence becomes a problem I can easily change it, but I prefer the > GPL if possible. > So, rather than going over everone's IANAL opinons about mixing licenses, let's just let Massimo know that it'd just be a lot easier to PostgreSQL/BSD license the whole thing, if he doesn't mind too much. Ross On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:42:48AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: <I'm not sure who wrote this, Bruce trimmed the attribution> > > Maybe it makes Massimo feel good ? It seems a worhty reason to me, as > > he has contributed a lot of useful stuff over the time. > > Yes, that is probably it. The GPL doesn't give anything to users, it > takes some control away from users and gives it to the author of the > code. >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: