is this possible? it should be!
| От | newsreader@mediaone.net | 
|---|---|
| Тема | is this possible? it should be! | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010819134900.A8735@dragon.universe обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: is this possible? it should be!
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-general | 
Hello
I have statements (highly simplified just to get
the point across) like
select a,b,c from a where d=2 order by e limit 10;
Now I think that because of "order by" the above query
already "knows" the result of the below query
select count(*) from a where d=2;
The point is that I want to know the total number
of matches and I also want to use "limit".  And
I don't want to do two queries.
If it's impossible I would like to know whether
it costs the same to PG if I use it with or
without limit.
If I use DBI and simplified queries look like
$s=$dbh->prepare('select a,b,c from a where d=2 order by e ');
$s->execute();
I get the total number of rows by
$n=$s->rows;
I then use perl to implement "limit"
Thanks in advance for any hints
		
	В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: