Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT

On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 03:38:08PM +0200, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Does PostgresQL have some way to make update, insert and delete queries
> not return the number of affected rows? I know that in MS SQL one would
> use NOCOUNT for that.

Just ignore the result. Postgres has to find all the rows anyway, so
avoiding counting them is hardly going to save any time.

Am I missing something?

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.