Tom Lane wrote: >[ redirected to pgsql-hackers for comment ] > >Helge Bahmann <bahmann@math.tu-freiberg.de> writes: >>
OnTue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote: >>> There is a more complete version of this capability in the Debian patch >>>
set. I think we've been waiting for Oliver to pull it out and submit it >>> as a patch... > >> Ok found it; uses "peer"
asa keyword instead of "ident" but basically >> does the same thing. I think you can discard my patch then. > >Well, we
needto talk about that. I like your idea of making ident auth >"just work" on local connections better than Oliver's
approachof >inventing a separate auth-type keyword. So some kind of merger of the >two patches seems attractive to me.
But Oliver may feel that he has to >continue to support the "peer" keyword on Debian anyway, for backwards
>compatibility. If so, do we want different ways of doing the same thing >on different distros, or should we just
followthe Debian precedent to >keep things ugly-but-consistent?
This change has only been made in the unstable release; so I don't mind
if peer and ident are folded together. Anyone running unstable knows
the world may turn upside down beneath him!
So if you have a patch to do that, go ahead.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
======================================== "Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not
afraid,neither be thou dismayed; for the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest."
Joshua 1:9