Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Дата
Msg-id 200107190000.f6J00AF05219@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Remember most pg_description comments are not on column but on functions
> > and stuff.  That attributenumber is not going to apply there.
> 
> Sure, it'd just be zero for non-column items.

What do we do with other columns that need descriptions and don't have
oid column.  Make the attribute column mean something else?  I just
don't see a huge gain here and lots of confusion.  User tables are a
different story.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Следующее
От: "Rod Taylor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)