> * I agree with Tom's assertion that it's an awful lot of complexity for such
> a marginal gain. Look at the size of the patch and the fact that it has all
> been useless for the last few years.
>
> * I didn't send it to -patches because it's not ready yet.
>
> * Only posted a URL, not the patch itself. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Tom actually suggested doing this at the same time as re-enabling partial
> indices but I favoured a separate patch considering the large number of
> scattered changes.
>
> Anyway, is there a concensus, or shall I forget the whole thing?
I vote for removing the feature. Removing stuff of doubtful usefulness
is a big gain.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026