Re: Rule recompilation
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Rule recompilation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200107121757.f6CHv2V04751@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: Rule recompilation ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> > Anyway, what's the preferred syntax for triggering the rule
> > recompilation? I thought about
> >
> > ALTER RULE {rulename|ALL} RECOMPILE;
> >
> > Where ALL triggers only those rules where the user actually
> > has RULE access right on a relation.
>
> In good world rules (PL functions etc) should be automatically
> marked as dirty (ie recompilation required) whenever referenced
> objects are changed.
Yepp, and it'd be possible for rules (just not right now). But we're not in a really good world, so it'll
not be possible for PL's.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: