Re: More Red Hat information
| От | GH |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More Red Hat information |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010626115247.B75326@over-yonder.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: More Red Hat information (wsheldah@lexmark.com) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:57:55AM -0400, some SMTP stream spewed forth: > > > I agree. How is a person supposed to count the number of users if the database > is being used to support a public dynamic web site? Is the company supposed to > buy a separate license for every unique IP address that ever hits a dynamic web > page on the site? I can see licensing per server, or even per CPU, but > licensing any server application per user quickly becomes ridiculous when the > server is supporting any internet application. I believe "user" refers to simultaneous connections. I could be wrong. Look at this way: PostgreSQL: free MS SQL: not free Hm, tough one. (And, I think I could figure out a new database for less than a few grand.) ;-) gh
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: